Manager due diligence for teams that need source-backed financial judgment.

Manager due diligence draws on a wide source envelope — PPM, LPA, side letters, DDQ responses, audited financials, track record workbooks. Analysts extract fees and returns in parallel; partners redline the LPA against House standards; the IC reads a pack that must not drift from the memorandum. When sources are fragmented, contradictions stay buried, and the final artifact may not preserve the reasoning path.

• Fee schedules in the PPM disagree with side-letter terms — surfaced late or not at all
• Track record figures are duplicated across workbooks without a single cited source
• LPA redlines are drafted without quoting the underlying clause text
• IC packs are rewritten separately from the memorandum and drift on key facts
• Partner review depends on individual analyst habits rather than a repeatable standard

Built for senior finance teams who need committee-ready artifacts — not chat transcripts.

Family office CIO

Use casePrimary or follow-on fund commitment

Moment of needA GP asks for capital before the IC meets

OutputManager IDD memorandum and IC pack

Allocator analyst

Use caseManager re-up diligence

Moment of needThe question is what changed since the last commitment

OutputDelta redline against prior LPA and track record

Fund-of-funds partner

Use caseMulti-manager underwriting

Moment of needFee schedules and side letters must reconcile before terms are signed

OutputFee reconcile report and risk register

Investment committee

Use caseCommittee preparation

Moment of needPartners need a defensible read before capital is committed

OutputIC pack derived from the same source spans as the memorandum

Source materials enter the engagement as a controlled register — scanned, classified, and scoped before the workflow runs.

A versioned pipeline — each stage records what happened, what you can review, and what output it produces.

Committee-ready artifacts — each with a named reviewer and a defensibility standard.

• Manager IDD memorandum

  25–40 pages structured to the House reading template, with every factual claim citing a source span by hash.

  Reviewed by

  Partner or principal before sign-off

  Defensibility

  Claims re-verify against source hash at read time; changed sources flag red.

• Investment committee pack

  Derived from the same source spans as the memorandum so the two cannot drift.

  Reviewed by

  IC chair and deal team

  Defensibility

  Single fact set renders both documents; disagreement requires an explicit edit.

• LPA redline

  Clause-by-clause comparison against the House standard side-letter positions.

  Reviewed by

  Partner and counsel

  Defensibility

  Each position quotes the underlying LPA clause; uncited redlines are refused.

• Risk register

  Severity-ordered risks with rationale citations from audited financials and track record.

  Reviewed by

  Partner and risk committee

  Defensibility

  Every risk entry ties to a cited source span; missing evidence surfaces as an exception.

Manager DD treats citation as a contract, not a formatting choice. Fee objects, return series, redline positions, and risk entries each point to a source chunk by hash. Review versions are preserved; partner comments and changes are recorded before the memorandum is locked.

• Span-level citation — a claim on page 42 of the PPM cites that table, not the document title
• IC pack and memorandum share one citation map — they cannot disagree without an explicit edit
• Contradictions across documents are callouts, not silent resolutions
• Locked versions are immutable; a new commitment cycle starts a new version

Diligence OS supports investment judgment. It does not make investment decisions, provide investment advice, or guarantee risk detection.

Prompt-based tools produce inconsistent outputs with weak provenance. This workflow runs a structured process with an admitted source envelope and a versioned review path.

Institutional outcomes — not productivity slogans.

• Compress manager diligence cycles without lowering the evidence standard
• Improve partner leverage — analysts produce cited drafts, partners challenge and sign
• Standardize LPA redline quality against the House standard, clause by clause
• Preserve institutional memory across re-ups and manager relationships
• Reduce missed contradictions between PPM, side letters, and track record workbooks
• Create a defensible record the IC can read in full before capital is committed

Closed by construction — each engagement runs inside a dedicated chamber with an append-only audit trail.

• Closed-system workflow — each engagement runs in an isolated chamber
• Engagement-level isolation with row-level tenant scoping
• Source-controlled review — partners read drafts against the audit log
• No training on customer documents — ever, by anyone
• Citation-backed artifacts with hash-verified source spans
• Versioned workflow history preserved on every run
• Audit trail on reads, retrievals, model calls, and locks
• Reviewer traceability — partner review recorded before sign-off

Adjacent diligence processes in the same controlled system.